English Cluster FALL 2012 ESSAY #2
Briana Regalado Letter
Dear residents of Animal Farm,
Thou shalt rejoice over the revolution thou have fought to uphold! Although it gives me great
joy to hear about this marvelous plan, unfortunately it was ruined by a few of our “fellow
compadres”. First and foremost, the origins of the revolution began with Old Major’s wise
tellings of the old days and how man has slowly destroyed our land. With his guidance and
solemn strength, we animals were able to rise against our master, Farmer Jones, and bring him
down below our level. The aftermath of the revolution was dimwittedly ruined by many of our
comrades. I shall discuss the two leaders who majorly ruined the revolution, commencing with
Napoleon.
Napoleon is a powerful character. He is very demeaning, manipulative, and disturbingly
corrupted. Napoleon’s part in the downfall of the revolution was never shedding a single drop of sweat
to cooperate in any contribution to the revolution. Instead, he accomplished deeds for his own
sake. He was also very cruel, such as when he confiscated Jessie and Bluebell’s pups. “He took
them up into a loft which could only be reached by a ladder from the harness-room, and kept
them in such seclusion than the rest of the farm soon forgot their existence” (Orwell, 35). This
selfish act was done for his benefit to destroy the farm and the animals. He was lazy, bullied the
other animals and educated himself rather than aid the others in understanding the
commandments of the new farm. His manipulation and constant lying to the animals made him
a corrupt leader. Unfortunately, many animals believed in his word, for example, when Boxer
states, “Napoleon is always right” (Orwell, 61). These poor animals confided in you, and you let
them down miserably. It is shameful that Napoleon tricked all of you. Nonetheless, Napoleon’s
lack of belief in the revolution all the while was more than enough to wreck a marvelous
opportunity to reach the goals of the revolution. Of course he is not the only character who
destroyed the revolution.
Squealer is the other sort that aided the fall of the revolution. He is of the manipulative type.
Squealer definitely lived up to his name. He used his smarts to get the other uneducated
animals confused, really confused. Squealer always turned the words of the other pigs around
for his better judgment, as well as using his knowledge and vocabulary to manipulate the lesser
educated animals. For instance when Napoleon sent him to explain odd circumstances that
occurred in the farm, when really Napoleon and Squealer were making misfits. “You do not
imagine I hope that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege” (Orwell, 35).
Squealer made up ridiculous excuses to cover up any crude acts being done by Napoleon or
himself in order to save themselves. This was very cruel and it is one of the reasons why the
animals were misled by the pigs. In turn, they confused you all and were not available to help
any comrade understand the revolution and its benefits. Squealer did not aid anyone. His role
was diminishing and confusing the other animals by falsifying certain facts about the
revolution such as changing the words of the commandments or changing Napoleon’s words so
the animals will be on his side. Speech holds a vast amount of power. Squealer always took
advantage of his manipulative words, which made him not trustworthy.
In other words, both Napoleon and Squealer were two of the major downfalls of the
revolution. What do I think they should change to produce a more positive outcome? I suggest
that the pigs work with each other and with the other animals on the farm to bring about a
better revolution. Trust is lacking among the animals. The recipe for a successful revolution
requires trust. Instead of only educating yourselves, switching the other’s words, and confusing
the less intelligent animals, you all should work together. Teamwork is the key to any successful
project whether it be building a corporate building or starting a revolution. Take this into
consideration and your revolution would come out very successful!
Luck be with you,
Briana Regalado
George Orwell, 1945, Animal Farm
Briana--really good detailed analysis--well supported; quotes smoothly integrated and essay is well organized and focused. A few awkward/confusing phrases--at beginning, a little too Biblical? in middle--"making misfits"?--don't know what this means. your conclusion shifts from "you"--addressing animals directly to "they"--better to stay with you! B+
ReplyDelete