First, I am quite satisfied with both arguments, president Obama and governor Romney. they clearly stated their own point of view about: economy, taxes, jobs, education, medicare; which, could prevent a collapse. Each of them smartly developed their ideas as a way to support the idea of why either of them would do a good job as the president of the United States.
Their point about economic is kind of confusing since they had not specific statement on it. Ideas like making new plans and programs or cutting actual programs sound great but the details of how to get to do it were not clear. we need a less attacking process on it and more talking about their specific goals at economic.
Taxes was a very important point on this debate, how to deal with taxes is really important for each of us. Both have logic in their ideas for taxes since they want to cut taxes for meddle-class but in difference Obama wants to increase taxes for business sounds good if they are doing good but he didn't talk abut the inflation that i am sure will increase if he increase taxes for companies; while, Romney is aware of the inflation but wants to keep reduce taxes for small companies as well but as Obama said many of those companies a run for really wealthy people. its a important point we need to pay attention since it leads to the next point, jobs.
Romney believes that increasing taxes for companies will kill jobs but I think that it will still happen even if they reduce taxes for companies, companies only look for the best best of getting more profit; therefore, increasing taxes for them as applying more regulation could be helpful for the economy. To increase jobs we need to increase our education level and both agree with that.
Both, Obama and Romney share that education should be improved but the way each of them plan to do it is far different from each other. both want to keep federal help but i didn't hear anything about spending more on education from Romney but he wants to grade each school, it doesn't help much because not all the student in a state going to to assist in the same school for its high grade, it juts sounds stupid; there wouldn't be enough space and would reduce job opportunity for those who didn't graduated from a high graded school. Here is when i give a point to Obama's education structure, because he wants to spend more money in books and teachers to ensure a knowledge progress.
Medicare is a a point they should work more because its clear that both have not clear ideas about it. Obama did help people but it could still be improved; while, Romney prefer to to deal in in a federal way but not leave it to the states which could me fine but then private insurance companies would take advantages of it as they are more expensive. federal government should help states to deal with this problem
I truly believe that gaps in government's plans and actions are the subtext in novel; they are not mentioned but those details are what strongly conduct the way it develops. In other words, citizens need to have a clearer idea of those details to avoid the confusion of which candidate has the mentality we as a nation need.
Geovanni--I really like your focus on the economic issues--you seem to have a good grasp of what they are talking about so maybe you can share your thoughts in class!--your conclusion about gaps and subtext--exactly right!
ReplyDelete