Matthew Shepherd was brutally
murdered on October, 6 of 1998. He was a 21year old student living in the town
of Laramie, Wyoming. His death was publicized and highly exemplified as a hate
crime against a gay individual. The tradgedy was so flabbergasting that the
Tectonic Theatre Project gathered a number of interviewers and send them to the
town to get as much information and insight on the murder, lives and opinions of
those who surrounded Matt. A play was then formatted freely, and both sides of
Laramie were explored.
Dr.Cantway
was the doctor who consistently updated the media as he tended to Matt. A man
who openly disagrees with the homosexual life yet, he never gave negative
commentary about his patient. Then, at the other end of the spectrum was the
Baptist Minister, who doesn’t speak much, but elaborates his opinions of
homosexuality by his heavy comment “I hope that Matthew Shepherd as he was tied
to that fence, had time to reflect on his lifestyle.” (Laramie Project, 69)
I
believe that there are many factors to the difference of feelings and opinions
expressed by both of these individuals. Firstly, Dr.Cantway had a personal and
close contact view of Matthew. He witnessed the intensity of the situation. The
blood stained boy, the coma he fell in to, the weeping parents; the doctor
tended to this young man as a human, not as a gay, or a fag or homosexual. The
Baptist on the other hand, had no type of communication, whether physical,
spiritual, nothing of the sort. He was a distant stranger, who spoke according
to the text in his religion and the words chiseled into him from a Bible. His profession is to preach about the evils of
the world, and Matthew, whom he has never had contact with, is a perfect
example of that ‘evil’.
When
your profession is to take care of the wounded, a sort of intimate relationship
connects the patient and that who is tending to them. The doctor felt the
sympathy and was certainly impacted to know that this person dying in front of
him; was beaten by two other boys that he had taken care of. I think that
experience opened his eyes to the fact that it doesn’t matter who it is that
walks inside his doors for help, what they did was unacceptable. “…I took care
of both of their bodies. And.. for a brief moment I wondered if this is how God
feels when he looks down at us.” (Laramie Project, 38)
I
definitely believe that the attitudes expressed by these two individuals are
culturally produced. We become a by-product of our society. Even Shannon, a
friend of one of the accused said it when asked if the two went to school
together. “Can’t you tell, we’re a product of our society” (Laramie Project,
62) As children, there are certain things that are taught to us. Our beliefs
are grown from habit of thought. As we grow older, there are many times where
becoming independent and experiencing new things can help us create our own
beliefs. But in this case, many of these people were basically stuck in a box.
Their beliefs are caged inside their heads with no type of freedom, or
questioning. That is what happened with these two men, one experiences real
live humans hurting and connects with their reality. While the other preaches
his beliefs off of a book, an experience which is not even his own.
Really thoughtful essay Cat--I especially admire the way you contrast the doctor and the minister in terms of human contact versus abstract idea of evil! We may discuss your essay a little in class today :) A+
ReplyDelete